Arresting Children: Examining Recent Trends in Preteen Crime

Contributing Organization(s): Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago


Author(s)/Creator(s): Jeffrey A. Butts; Howard N. Snyder

Publishing Date: 2008-06-19

Issue Areas: Children and Youth; Crime and Safety

Ownership/Rights Info: Copyright 2008 Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University

File info: 22 pages; 641.76 KB file size

Download now

Alternative access/additional info

Are juvenile offenders getting younger? The American public often hears policymakers and justice practitioners assert that young people are committing crimes at younger and younger ages. Is this true? This analysis explores this question by examining data collected by law enforcement agencies across the country. It tracks juvenile crime patterns from 1980 through 2006 and finds that the age profile of juvenile offenders has not changed substantially in 25 years. Crime rates among children under age 13 have generally followed the same crime patterns exhibited among older youth. In a few offense categories, however, increases in preteen crime have outpaced increases among older juveniles, particularly sexual offenses, assaults, and weapons possession (not necessarily firearms). The fact that school authorities and family members often report these offenses suggests a possible hypothesis to explain increases in some preteen crimes: The juvenile justice system today may be dealing with child behavior problems that were once the responsibility of social welfare agencies, schools, and families.

Access this research:

Download now

Alternative access/additional info


Intended Audience: Advocates; College/University Professors; Legislators/Legislative Aids; Policy Professionals; Researchers

Type/Format: Policy Brief

Language code: English

Coverage:



Comment & Review

Research Review
Posted by: Research_Reviewer on Sat, 30 Aug 08 02:02:57 +0000

Extremely great research paper. Reading and observing all the data facts and numbers along with percentages for preteens and juveniles only made me want to read even more page after page. There were some data that wasn’t surprising to read, but other was just, “whoa.” Such surprising data was the female to male ratio in preteen to juvenile offenders’ analysis in person-offense incidents. Table 5 was a very surprising gathered data as it expressed female offenders and victims. Just looking at the percentage numbers of female offenders for sexual assault for preteens doubling those 13 years old and older very much disgusted me. As well, sexual assaults done by preteens were more than doubled to those victims under the age of seven; family member victimization was even more shocking in the sexual assault category. 

            The gathered data between 1980 and 2006 for weapon offenses were found to have increased 235% for preteens and 78% for those 13 years old and older. I could see this data as understandable since all the weapon violence that has happened over the years in schools might have greatly influenced these preteens. Moreover, other influence may have been started by juveniles beginning the crimes and preteens following in their footsteps. These influences will explain the crimes that have been occurred by preteens but surely will not excuse their motives.

            For a bit of more improvement on the research data, I would like to see the population number and the location of these crimes. I feel that including that information, it will be an essential element to the whole paper. Moreover, the percentages given in Table 1 for Preteens of all juvenile arrests in comparison between the years 1980 and 2006, there is no definite number on the arrests. The line graphs in the figures are great as they show much increases and decreases of preteen crimes. Looking at table 4, preteens accounted for 1 of every 40 person offenders reported to law enforcement agencies in 2005, show only ages and percentages without any gender proportions which would be interesting to see.

            All of these increases and decreases in violence do not describe or explain the data gathered. There is also location and event correspondence that is not included in this paper, which I believe is an essential part of explaining the results gathered. Events that have occurred over the years might have influenced these crimes to increase or decrease in numbers. Such events could be any of the following or others: September 11th, 2001, Columbine Shooting, and/or others.  Overall, this paper is extraordinary and I loved reading it page to page. Great work. 


Rating: 1 Rating: 2 Rating: 3 Rating: 4 Rating: 5
 Votes: 17 | Average Rating: 3
 Click to add your rating!

Tags that LabRats have added to this research:

juvenile justice preteen crimes

Add your tags
View all tags

Related Research

Explore related research listed in the same issue areas.

Related research:


Share and Share Alike

The golden rule at IssueLab ... share the knowledge, share the love!




Looking for some attention? Contact us about current ad rates.