Assessing Financial Vulnerability in the Nonprofit Sector

Contributing Organization(s): Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations


Author(s)/Creator(s): Elizabeth K. Keating; Mary Fischer; Teresa P. Gordon; Janet S. Greenlee

Publishing Date: 2005-01-01

Issue Areas: Nonprofits and Philanthropy

Ownership/Rights Info: Please consult the copyright holder before using or repurposing this information.

File info: 41 pages; 1.05 MB file size

Download now

Alternative access/additional info

Effective nonprofit governance relies upon understanding an organization's financial condition and vulnerabilities. However, financial vulnerability of nonprofit organizations is a relatively new area of study. In this paper, we compare two models used to forecast bankruptcy in the corporate sector (Altman 1968 and Ohlson 1980) with the model used by nonprofit researchers (Tuckman and Chang 1991). We find that the Ohlson model has higher explanatory power than either Tuckman and Chang's or Altman's in predicting four different measures of financial vulnerability. However, we show that none of the models, individually or combined, are effective in predicting financial distress. We then propose a more comprehensive model of financial vulnerability by adding two new variables to represent reliance on commercial-type activities to generate revenues and endowment sufficiency. We find that this model outperforms Ohlson's model and performs substantially better in explaining and predicting financial vulnerability. Hence, the expanded model can be used as a guide for understanding the drivers of financial vulnerability and for identifying more effective proxies for nonprofit sector financial distress for use in future research. This publication is Hauser Center Working Paper No. 27. The Hauser Center Working Paper Series was launched during the summer of 2000. The Series enables the Hauser Center to share with a broad audience important works-in-progress written by Hauser Center scholars and researchers.

Access this research:

Download now

Alternative access/additional info


Intended Audience: Advocates; College/University Professors; Policy Professionals; Researchers

Type/Format: Whitepaper

Language code: English

Comment & Review

This is a new feature. Be the first to comment on this research!

Rating: 1 Rating: 2 Rating: 3 Rating: 4 Rating: 5
 Votes: 4 | Average Rating: 4
 Click to add your rating!

Tags that LabRats have added to this research:

Add your tags
View all tags

Related Research

Explore related research listed in the same issue areas.

There is no related research. Try our advanced search.


Share and Share Alike

The golden rule at IssueLab ... share the knowledge, share the love!




Looking for some attention? Contact us about current ad rates.