The Tripartite Framework for Leadership Evaluation provides a comprehensive examination of the leadership evaluation landscape and makes key recommendations about how the field of leadership evaluation should proceed. The chief concern addressed by this working paper is the use of student outcome data as a measurement of leadership effectiveness. A second concern in our work with urban leaders is the absence or surface treatment of race and equity in nearly all evaluation instruments or processes. Finally, we call for an overhaul of the conventional cycle of inquiry, which is based largely on needs analysis and leader deficits, and incomplete use of evidence to support recurring short cycles within the larger yearly cycle of inquiry.
What to read next
Published by
- Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education
- University of California, Berkeley Graduate School of Education Leadership Connection
Funded by
Copyright
- Copyright 2013 Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education, University of California, Berkeley Graduate School of Education Leadership Connection.
Document type
Language
Linked Data show/hide