GET EMAILS UPLOAD

Background Paper: How Should We Classify Civil Society?: A Review of Mainstream and Alternative Approaches

Dec 3, 2008

DESCRIPTION

This brief analysis reviews mainstream classification schemes before introducing a proposal for classifying civil society actors by their orientation within political theories of civil society.

Background Paper: How Should We Classify Civil Society?: A Review of Mainstream and Alternative Approaches

Download via Publisher

Download via IssueLab (80.84 KB)

Save To Library

Suggest an edit

Published By

International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC)

Copyright

Document Type

Issue/Policy Brief

Language

English

Geography

Global

Linked Data show/hide

This web page is marked up with Schema.org microdata. Much of the necessary microdata is embedded within the HTML that creates the display you see above. The data that shows below is formatted for machine-reading and rounds out the complete descriptive set for this resource. Want more info about all of this? Go here. You can also view the complete dataset for this resource the way a machine sees it here .

Title: Background Paper: How Should We Classify Civil Society?: A Review of Mainstream and Alternative Approaches
Publication date 2008-12-03
Publication Year 2008
Authors Geoffrey Cameron
Copyright holder(s) International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC)
Geographical Focus Global
Keywords civil , society , NGOs , organisations , CIVICUS
Document type Issue/Policy Brief
Language English
URL: https://www.issuelab.org/resource/background-paper-how-should-we-classify-civil-society-a-review-of-mainstream-and-alternative-approaches.html
Resource provided by IssueLab

Explore Collections

IssueLab Results is #OpenForGood

Gun Violence

Immigration Strategies

Affordable Care Act

Joining Forces

Race and Policing

New York Foundation Grantee Publications

European Foundation Centre's Virtual Library

TrustAfrica's African Giving Knowledge Base