Cases That Would Have Been: Three Years After AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, Claims of Corporate Wrongdoing Continue to Pile Up

by Christine Hines; Ellen Taverna

May 1, 2014

In the wake of two U.S. Supreme Court rulings in the past three years, consumers, workers and others harmed by unfair fine print in contracts are increasingly being shut out of the courthouse, a new Public Citizen and National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) report shows.The report identifies 140 cases affecting thousands of consumers or employees over the past three years where a court enforced an arbitration clause and barred the claimants from participating in class actions.
Cases That Would Have Been: Three Years After AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, Claims of Corporate Wrongdoing Continue to Pile Up

Download via IssueLab (891.63 KB)

Save To Library

Suggest an edit

What to read next

Published by

Copyright

  • Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Document type

Language

Geography

Linked Data show/hide