GET EMAILS UPLOAD

Setting a National Minimum Standard for Health Benefits: How Do State Benefit Mandates Compare With Benefits in Large-Group Plans?

by Allison Frey; Cathy Schoen; Rachel Nuzum; Stephanie Mika

Jun 23, 2009

DESCRIPTION

Based on a comparison between states' minimum health benefit mandates and those for federal employees, considers whether a proposed federal standard would require more or less generous coverage than is state-mandated.

Setting a National Minimum Standard for Health Benefits: How Do State Benefit Mandates Compare With Benefits in Large-Group Plans?

Download via Publisher

Download via IssueLab (721.82 KB)

Save To Library

Suggest an edit

Published By

Commonwealth Fund

Funded By

Commonwealth Fund

Copyright

Document Type

Issue/Policy Brief

Language

English

Geography

North America / United States

Linked Data show/hide

This web page is marked up with Schema.org microdata and formatted for machine-reading. Here's why that matters. Have a peek at what a machine sees here .

Title: Setting a National Minimum Standard for Health Benefits: How Do State Benefit Mandates Compare With Benefits in Large-Group Plans?
Publication date 2009-06-23
Publication Year 2009
Authors Allison Frey , Cathy Schoen , Rachel Nuzum , Stephanie Mika
Copyright holder(s) Commonwealth Fund
Geographical Focus North America / United States
Keywords state mandates , mandates , benefits , coverage , health
Document type Issue/Policy Brief
Language English
URL: https://www.issuelab.org/resource/setting-a-national-minimum-standard-for-health-benefits-how-do-state-benefit-mandates-compare-with-benefits-in-large-group-plans.html
Resource provided by IssueLab

Explore Collections

IssueLab Results is #OpenForGood

Democracy

Gun Violence

Immigration Strategies

Affordable Care Act

Race and Policing

New York Foundation Grantee Publications

European Foundation Centre's Virtual Library

TrustAfrica's African Giving Knowledge Base